Skip to main content

Legal Capsule: Recent Trends in Anti-Dumping Investigations by Economic Laws Practice



India is a frequent user of anti-dumping measures, having levied duties on 609 investigations since the inception of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) in 1995. There have been several changes in the trend of anti-dumping duty investigations conducted by Directorate General of Trade Remedies (“DGTR”) recently.

Consolidation of trade remedy forums and creation of DGTR
  • The Government of India, through an amendment to the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 on May 7, 2018, has consolidated multiple trade remedial forums under the umbrella of the “Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties” (“DGAD”). 
  • The DGAD, previously in charge of conducting anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations, has accordingly been rechristened the DGTR. 
  • The amendment creates a single integrated authority which will oversee both outbound as well as bound investigations on various trade remedial measures such as anti-dumping, anti-subsidy, safeguards and quantitative restrictions.

Greater flexibility on ‘form’ of duty
  • Three forms of duties under the anti-dumping framework are ‘fixed duties’ (fixed duty in USD per unit); ‘ad valorem duties’ (a fixed percentage of duty based on value); and ‘reference price duties’ (duty being levied based on the difference between the benchmark and import prices).
  • While India has historically favoured fixed duties for a majority of its anti-dumping levies, in recent times the Hon'ble Designated Authority has been considering different forms of anti-dumping duties at the time of recommending duties by way of final findings, in order to seek a balance between interests of all involved parties on a case to case basis.  

 Reduction in duration of duty levy to 3-years

  • The DGTR has the discretion to impose duties upto five years. 
  • Since April 2017, there have been five separate cases (out of thirty-six investigations) where the DGTR has recommended duties only for three years, taking a balanced position between the interests of the domestic industry and the interests of the opposing parties.
  • Prominent illustrations: Reference Price: MEK , Oxfloxin , O-Acids 

Record ‘No Duty’ recommendations made by the office of the DGTR

  • Since the year 2017-18, there has been a considerable increase in the proportion of cases where the DGTR has recommended ‘No Duty’ on at least one of the subject countries involved.
  • The largest impact of ‘No Duty’ recommendations has been observed in sunset reviews in over 45% of the cases in the year 2017-18 and 100% thereafter (3 sunset reviews issued in April and May 2018).
  • For the first time in the last five years, there were also four instances of the DGAD rejecting applications for sunset reviews in 2017-18.

Increasing focus on imports from Preferential Tariff Agreement sources such as Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand and others
  • With the signing of the various preferential tariff agreements, there has been a consistent increase in trade volumes and value between signatory countries. This has inevitably led to an increased focus on these countries during anti-dumping investigations.
  • Once such example is the Japan-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement and its impact on Japan’s increasing prominence in India’s anti-dumping investigations – there has been an increase of approximately 300 % for anti-dumping investigations for imports originating in Japan in year 2017-18 when compared to previous year.
  • At the same time, ‘No Duty’ results constituted 37.5% of these findings – consistent with the 36% ratio overall – which is promising.
  • Prominent Illustrations:Hot Rolled flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel ,Caustic Soda 
View the video of ELP Partner Sanjay Notani on the latest trade related regulatory developments.

Venture Intelligence is India's longest serving provider of data and analysis on Private Company Financials, Transactions (private equity, venture capital and M&A) & their Valuations in India.

Popular posts from this blog

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry.

Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back?

Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms of how…

KPMG Tops League Table for Financial Advisor to Private Equity Transactions in H1 2018

The transaction advisory unit of KPMG claimed the top position in the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to Private Equity deals in the first half of 2018, advising deals worth $1.7 Billion. KPMG acted as the financial advisor to NHAI in the $1.5 Billion investment by Macquarie to operate 9 highway projects under the toll-operate-transfer (TOT) model. Ernst &  Young (which advised the $730 million asset sale by Indiabulls Real Estate to Blackstone) and Kotak (which advised the Vishal Megamart - Partners Group deal) accounted for the second and third spots respectively.
The Venture Intelligence League Tables, the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Transaction and Legal Advisory firms.
Arpwood Capital (which advised the $760 million investment by Temasek in the $2.1 Billion Schneider Electric buyout of L&;T Electrical and Automation business) …

"Leveraged stock purchase led Arvind Rao to go astray": Forbes India

Forbes India has an article on the series of events leading to the recent controversial exit of Arvind Rao, Co-founder & CEO of listed Mobile VAS firm OnMobile.

On November 23, 2010, Arvind Rao, the 53-year-old co-founder and CEO of OnMobile, bought approximately 6 lakh shares of his company from the open market, representing a little over 1 percent of the company’s total shares....At Rs 277 a share, he had to pony up nearly Rs 16.5 crore to acquire them....So he went ahead and borrowed money to buy the shares, thinking nothing of the interest it entailed or the fact that he’d need to put up nearly half his existing shareholding as collateral...OnMobile’s shares continued to fall from those levels, while Rao’s interest payments ballooned.

...Motivated by OnMobile’s growth all these years, he had never paid much attention to his salary, most of which went towards the monthly rental on his sea-facing apartment in Mumbai and his BMW 7-Series, both paid directly by the company. He reque…