Skip to main content

Can HR services firms do justice when it comes to hiring VCs?

Recently, we have tracked several appointments and movements in the Indian VC/PE industry in our Venture Intelligence India newsletters. There has been a lot of churn at India-based firms as well as US firms who have been in India for a few years now. Plus, quite a few new US and European entrants into India have recently appointed country managers.

I've been wondering whether VC firms use HR services firms for hiring partners/country managers and if yes, whether HR services firms understand this unique industry well enough to do justice to it.

Which is why this interview with Charley Polachi, Founder and Managing Partner of Polachi & Company a Sherborn, MA-based executive search firm focused on the venture capital, private equity and technology markets, caught my attention.
Venture guys do deals, but they don’t do staff. They are inherently networked and they do much of the staffing for their portfolio companies, but the fact remains that the glory of the business is not about having great partners or a great CEO; it’s about doing a fabulous deal. We can put structure around the recruiting process. Recruiting a general partner for an existing partnership is like finding one spouse for seven or eight people. Imagine trying to get eight people to agree on whom they want to live with for the rest of their life. Second, we can handle all the approaching and rejecting, and both parties can hold up their heads and be dignified regardless of the outcome. We also track the industry more than the industry tracks itself...

...Generally, there are five key criteria VCs use when they go to hire: pedigree, fit, experience, peer review, and familiarity.

Pedigree is very specific firm by firm. There is a list of schools, in some cases several graduate and undergraduate, and if you didn’t go to both of those, you probably don’t need to apply.

Fit is the intangible dynamic of five meetings, three dinners, and a few bottles of wine. We may get a phone call the next morning saying, “This guy is absolutely awesome. He fits.” And I will ask, “Well, tell me more.” And the partners can’t. They just say he fits. But if he doesn’t fit, they can take half an hour trashing him for the wrong socks. They can go on and on about non-fit, but when I ask what constitutes fit, they can’t articulate it.

With respect to experience, the assessment is made on the least amount of information available as to whether or not you have been successful. You’re a hero or a zero based on guilt or glory by association. I can put 50 names on a whiteboard and sit down with four partners and I’m lucky if I have five names left, because everybody has an opinion and they can shred everyone based on what they know from the public domain.

Peer review is confronting this question in the eleventh hour of the search when you’re about to make an offer. The managing general partner leans over and says, “Well what do you think Greylock will think if we hire this guy?” It’s very similar to evaluating a deal that you really like. If, in the process, you find out that Highland, Matrix and Greylock all passed on it, you think to yourself, “They are smarter than I am, maybe I will pass.” Same thing happens in the hiring process. Their question is: “Is this guy going to help us to be perceived as a top-tier fund, or is hiring him going to push us down to a second-tier fund?”

The fifth point is familiarity. Many times, one of the general partners throws a name on the table at the eleventh hour and it turns out to be the name of a roommate from business school. Often, they wanted to hire this guy all along but couldn’t do it because it would be hard to sell to the partnership. So instead they propose the guy at the end of an exhaustive search, after evaluating 15 or 20 others, and settle on him because they know him. They are trying to minimize the risks. They will opt for someone who has lived with them; they will opt for someone they have backed twice.

Arun Natarajan is the Editor of TSJ Media, which tracks venture capital activity in India and Indian-founded companies worldwide. View sample issues of TSJ Media's Venture Intelligence India newsletters and reports.

Popular posts from this blog

EY Tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 24

Moelis & Company & PwC claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young  (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during 2024, advising 34 deals worth $4.1 Billion. Moelis & Company stood second advising 2 deals worth $3.9 billion. PwC followed with 18 deals worth $3.3 billion. Citi ($2.5 billion across 1 deal) and Advay Capital ($2.3 billion across 1 deal) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals in 2024, Citi  advised $2.5 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield , Advay Capital and Moelis & Company advised the $2.3 Billion acquisition of Care Hospitals by Aster DM Healthcare . Jefferies & Co., JP Morgan and Moelis & Company advised the $1.6 Billion acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines by Mankind Pharma.  Among the other notable M&A deals in Q4 2024, EY advised the $685 million acquisition of ITD Cementation ...

Morgan Stanley tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 2020

Morgan Stanley , which advised the $10.1 Billion strategic investment by Facebook and Google into Reliance Industries' telecom arm Jio platforms (among other Private Equity investments in the company), topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals for 2020. Ambit Corporate Finance - which advised 3 deals worth $4.0 Billion, including Brookfield's $3.7 Billion acquisition of Reliance Tower Infrastructure Trust -  took the second spot. JM Financial ($3.7 Billion across 5 deals), Metta Capital ($3.4 Billion across 3 deals) and ICICI Securities ($3.4 Billion across 2 deals) - all of whom (along with Citi) are advisors to the $3.4 Billion acquisition of Future Group's retail related ventures by Reliance Retail, announced in August - completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A tra...

Everything you wanted to know (and some things you didn't care to know) about ChrysCapital's Ashish Dhawan

New Delhi-based private equity fund ChrysCapital is vastly different from its former avatar, Chrysalis Capital. While Chrysalis began life (in Mumbai) as an venture capital firm focussed on start-up investments, today's ChrysCapital is best know for its late-stage investments (often in already public companies). The fascinating part of this transformation is that one of the fund's original partners - Senior Managing Director Ashish Dhawan - has been firmly in the driver's seat throughout the process. It's a story that needed to be told. As a cover story. Kudos to Business Today for telling it first. Thankfully, unlike the glowing profiles that BT is famous for - including the one featuring infamous stock brocker Harshad Mehta with his Lexus on the cover - this one has a lot of facts. Some well known. And others less so. That ChrysCapital's first fund would have been a disaster but for the pioneering investment in Raman Roy founded BPO firm Spectramind i...

Why did Sony Entertainment Television's CEO quit?

Businessworld has a cover story on the corporate battle that resulted in Kunal Dasgupta, the CEO of Multi Screen Media (formerly Sony Entertainment Television), quitting just a few months before his contract was due to end. Dasgupta’s abrupt exit was the culmination of six years of tension between majority shareholder Sony Pictures Television International (SPTI) that owns 61 per cent of MSM, on one hand, and Atlas Equifinn on the other, which is a consortium of Indian shareholders (Singapore-based Rakesh Aggarwal, World Media Group director Sudesh Iyer, Shemaroo Entertainment Managing Director Raman Maroo, MobiApps Holding’s Jayesh Parekh, B.R. Sule, Sushil Shergil and actor Jackie Shroff ) holding 32 per cent. Capital Japan and some financial institutions own the rest 7 per cent. And of course, the third protagonist is Dasgupta, who walked a tightrope and managed to keep his job for over 14 years despite the fact that neither group of shareholders was too happy with him. Very little...

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry. Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back? Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms...