Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Economic Laws Practice

GST rate reduction to 5% in the real estate sector: A winning stroke or a run out?

Authors: Rohit Jain, Gaurav Sogani

The real estate sector in India has faced several headwinds over the past few years. Demonetization in 2016, the introduction of GST in 2017 and the NBFC crisis in 2018. The question now is whether the revised scheme of GST will be a similar event in 2019.

At the outset, sale of a property pre and post construction, by a developer, has been treated differently for the purpose of levy of indirect taxes.  This basic issue still bothers the sector as both the transactions eventually entail the sale of an immovable property.

Be that as it may, the scheme of taxation for this sector has been continuously changing. With this recent change, this sector is evidencing the 5th regime of taxation, within a decade. The facts are presented in the table below.

ITC (Input tax credit)
Taxation on development rights
Prior to 2005
Not liable
Not available
Not liable
2005 - 2010
Disputed but finally held to be liable for VAT and Service Tax
VAT – allowed
Service Tax- not allowed
Not liable but disputed by VAT authorities
2010 - June 2017
Taxable to VAT & Service Tax
VAT – not allowed
Service Tax – allowed
While not liable but disputed not only by VAT but also Service Tax authorities
July 2017- March 2019
Liable to GST
Full ITC available
April 2019 onwards
Liable to GST
Exempt to the extent of sale prior to Completion Certificate

The basic ethos underlying the implementation of GST was revenue neutrality which means that the tax burden essentially pre and post GST regime remains the same.However, Real Estate sector stands out in revenue neutrality approach not being maintained, as evidenced from the fact that up to March 31, 2019, the GST rate of an under-construction property was 12% (effective tax rate). This proved to be a massive jolt to the real estate industry which was anyway struggling to stay afloat. 

Post several representations made by the industry and based on the recommendations of the GST Council, the Ministry of Finance finally notified a revised scheme whereby a GST rate of 5% without ITC, would be applicable to the sale of an under construction residential unit.

However, we need to carefully consider whether this revised scheme of 5% GST without ITC is more beneficial than 12% with ITC?  Though the optics seem very good, on analyzing the finer details, one can infer that this move does not actually tilt the balance favorably to the sector or the consumer. The government has effectively retained the same tax burden and, in fact, developers and consumers might be worse off in many instances.

To understand the real impact of the GST rate reduction, it is important to understand the hidden effects of denial of input tax credits on the costs of construction and on the marketing costs. In the extended suburbs of metros and in Tier II and Tier III cities, the ratio of cost of construction and marketing (Cost) to Sales Price (SP) is high as 45% to 50%. Consequently, the overall tax burden borne by the customer will now under the revised scheme is in the range of 14-15% (in metro suburbs, Tier II and Tier II cities).  Illustrating this with an example.

Sale price (SP)
Total tax cost
Effective tax cost
Additional tax burden
C = A*5%
D= B*20%
E= C+D
Till March 31, 2019

Note: Most of the construction related goods and services fall in 18% rate slab however cement continues to be under 28%. For the sake of calculation, ITC is computed on an average rate of 20%.

In a nutshell, the tax costs in the transaction is likely to be more and not less as would be expected.

Adding to the industry woes, the states of India have increased stamp duty by 1%. For example, in Maharashtra the  stamp duty has been increased to 6%.At best, this move of reduction to 5% has achieved certainty for the industry. While the customer is correct in expecting  a lower price of housing, developers are facing their own set of woes – while they need to meet customers’ expectations and pass on the lower rate of GST, the denial of ITC has squeezed them from both ends of the spectrum. Is this rate reduction, therefore, a winning stroke or run out?

Popular posts from this blog

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry.

Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back?

Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms of how…

PE Investments down by 36% in Q1'20

Press Release
Private Equity-Venture Capital (PE-VC) firms invested $5.9 Billion (across 164 deals) during the quarter ended March 2020 - 36% lower than the $9.2 Billion (across 249 transactions) during the same period last year, according to data from Venture Intelligence, a research service focused on private company financials, transactions and their valuations. The Q1'20 investments were also 37% lower compared to the immediate previous quarter (which had witnessed $9.4 Billion being invested across 227 transactions). (Note: These figures include Venture Capital investments, but exclude PE investments in Real Estate).
The latest quarter witnessed 14 PE-VC investments worth $100 million or more, down from the 20 such transactions in the same period last year. The largest PE-VC investment announced during Q1’20 was the $567 million takeover of power generation company RattanIndia Power by Goldman Sachs and Varde Partners. The second largest investment was SoftBank Vision Fund…

Ambit tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to Private Equity deals in 2019

Ambit Corporate Finance topped theVenture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to Private Equity Transactions for the year 2019. Ambit advised PE deals worth $2.4 Billion (across 4 qualifying transactions) during the period. Citi ($1.1 Billion across 2 deals) and Avendus ($969 million across 12 deals) took the second and third spot. Edelweiss Financial Services ($758 million across 9 deals) and PwC ($708 million across 15 deals) completed the top five in 2019. 

The Venture Intelligence League Tables, the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Financial and Legal Advisory firms.
Ambit Corporate Finance advised the $1.9 Billion buyout of Pipeline Infrastructure from Reliance Industriesby Brookfield Asset Management and the IFC and I Squared Capital-backedCube Highways' acquisition of Delhi-Agra Toll Road from Reliance Infrastructure (Reliance ADAG). Citi advise…

PE investments in 2018 crosses $33-B to set new all-time high

Big Ticket investments in consumer apps Swiggy & Byju’s dominates year-end activity, even as investments in Core Sectors slow down
Private Equity (PE) investments in India rose to their highest ever figure of $33.1 billion in 2018 (across 720 transactions), according to data from Venture Intelligence (, a research service focused on private company financials, transactions and their valuations. While PE investments have already surpassed the previous high - $24.3 Billion across 734 deals in 2017 - in the first nine months of 2018, the mega investments in Consumer Internet & Mobile startups such as Swiggy and Byjus towards the year-end, helped the 2018 total vault by 36% year-on-year. (Note: These figures include Venture Capital investments, but exclude PE investments in Real Estate.) The year witnessed 81 PE investments worth $100 million or more (accounting for 77% of the total investment value during the period), compared to 47 such transac…

"Leveraged stock purchase led Arvind Rao to go astray": Forbes India

Forbes India has an article on the series of events leading to the recent controversial exit of Arvind Rao, Co-founder & CEO of listed Mobile VAS firm OnMobile.

On November 23, 2010, Arvind Rao, the 53-year-old co-founder and CEO of OnMobile, bought approximately 6 lakh shares of his company from the open market, representing a little over 1 percent of the company’s total shares....At Rs 277 a share, he had to pony up nearly Rs 16.5 crore to acquire them....So he went ahead and borrowed money to buy the shares, thinking nothing of the interest it entailed or the fact that he’d need to put up nearly half his existing shareholding as collateral...OnMobile’s shares continued to fall from those levels, while Rao’s interest payments ballooned.

...Motivated by OnMobile’s growth all these years, he had never paid much attention to his salary, most of which went towards the monthly rental on his sea-facing apartment in Mumbai and his BMW 7-Series, both paid directly by the company. He reque…