Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Economic Laws Practice

GST rate reduction to 5% in the real estate sector: A winning stroke or a run out?

Authors: Rohit Jain, Gaurav Sogani

The real estate sector in India has faced several headwinds over the past few years. Demonetization in 2016, the introduction of GST in 2017 and the NBFC crisis in 2018. The question now is whether the revised scheme of GST will be a similar event in 2019.


At the outset, sale of a property pre and post construction, by a developer, has been treated differently for the purpose of levy of indirect taxes.  This basic issue still bothers the sector as both the transactions eventually entail the sale of an immovable property.


Be that as it may, the scheme of taxation for this sector has been continuously changing. With this recent change, this sector is evidencing the 5th regime of taxation, within a decade. The facts are presented in the table below.

Period
Taxability
ITC (Input tax credit)
Taxation on development rights
Prior to 2005
Not liable
Not available
Not liable
2005 - 2010
Disputed but finally held to be liable for VAT and Service Tax
VAT – allowed
Service Tax- not allowed
Not liable but disputed by VAT authorities
2010 - June 2017
Taxable to VAT & Service Tax
VAT – not allowed
Service Tax – allowed
While not liable but disputed not only by VAT but also Service Tax authorities
July 2017- March 2019
Liable to GST
Full ITC available
Taxable
April 2019 onwards
Liable to GST
No ITC
Exempt to the extent of sale prior to Completion Certificate


The basic ethos underlying the implementation of GST was revenue neutrality which means that the tax burden essentially pre and post GST regime remains the same.However, Real Estate sector stands out in revenue neutrality approach not being maintained, as evidenced from the fact that up to March 31, 2019, the GST rate of an under-construction property was 12% (effective tax rate). This proved to be a massive jolt to the real estate industry which was anyway struggling to stay afloat. 

Post several representations made by the industry and based on the recommendations of the GST Council, the Ministry of Finance finally notified a revised scheme whereby a GST rate of 5% without ITC, would be applicable to the sale of an under construction residential unit.

However, we need to carefully consider whether this revised scheme of 5% GST without ITC is more beneficial than 12% with ITC?  Though the optics seem very good, on analyzing the finer details, one can infer that this move does not actually tilt the balance favorably to the sector or the consumer. The government has effectively retained the same tax burden and, in fact, developers and consumers might be worse off in many instances.

To understand the real impact of the GST rate reduction, it is important to understand the hidden effects of denial of input tax credits on the costs of construction and on the marketing costs. In the extended suburbs of metros and in Tier II and Tier III cities, the ratio of cost of construction and marketing (Cost) to Sales Price (SP) is high as 45% to 50%. Consequently, the overall tax burden borne by the customer will now under the revised scheme is in the range of 14-15% (in metro suburbs, Tier II and Tier II cities).  Illustrating this with an example.

Sale price (SP)
COC
Total tax cost
Effective tax cost
Additional tax burden
A
B
C = A*5%
D= B*20%
E= C+D
Till March 31, 2019
[F=A*12%]
(E-F)
100
45
5
9
14
12
2









Note: Most of the construction related goods and services fall in 18% rate slab however cement continues to be under 28%. For the sake of calculation, ITC is computed on an average rate of 20%.

In a nutshell, the tax costs in the transaction is likely to be more and not less as would be expected.

Adding to the industry woes, the states of India have increased stamp duty by 1%. For example, in Maharashtra the  stamp duty has been increased to 6%.At best, this move of reduction to 5% has achieved certainty for the industry. While the customer is correct in expecting  a lower price of housing, developers are facing their own set of woes – while they need to meet customers’ expectations and pass on the lower rate of GST, the denial of ITC has squeezed them from both ends of the spectrum. Is this rate reduction, therefore, a winning stroke or run out?


Popular posts from this blog

EY Tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 24

Moelis & Company & PwC claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young  (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during 2024, advising 34 deals worth $4.1 Billion. Moelis & Company stood second advising 2 deals worth $3.9 billion. PwC followed with 18 deals worth $3.3 billion. Citi ($2.5 billion across 1 deal) and Advay Capital ($2.3 billion across 1 deal) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals in 2024, Citi  advised $2.5 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield , Advay Capital and Moelis & Company advised the $2.3 Billion acquisition of Care Hospitals by Aster DM Healthcare . Jefferies & Co., JP Morgan and Moelis & Company advised the $1.6 Billion acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines by Mankind Pharma.  Among the other notable M&A deals in Q4 2024, EY advised the $685 million acquisition of ITD Cementation ...

Morgan Stanley tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 2020

Morgan Stanley , which advised the $10.1 Billion strategic investment by Facebook and Google into Reliance Industries' telecom arm Jio platforms (among other Private Equity investments in the company), topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals for 2020. Ambit Corporate Finance - which advised 3 deals worth $4.0 Billion, including Brookfield's $3.7 Billion acquisition of Reliance Tower Infrastructure Trust -  took the second spot. JM Financial ($3.7 Billion across 5 deals), Metta Capital ($3.4 Billion across 3 deals) and ICICI Securities ($3.4 Billion across 2 deals) - all of whom (along with Citi) are advisors to the $3.4 Billion acquisition of Future Group's retail related ventures by Reliance Retail, announced in August - completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A tra...

Everything you wanted to know (and some things you didn't care to know) about ChrysCapital's Ashish Dhawan

New Delhi-based private equity fund ChrysCapital is vastly different from its former avatar, Chrysalis Capital. While Chrysalis began life (in Mumbai) as an venture capital firm focussed on start-up investments, today's ChrysCapital is best know for its late-stage investments (often in already public companies). The fascinating part of this transformation is that one of the fund's original partners - Senior Managing Director Ashish Dhawan - has been firmly in the driver's seat throughout the process. It's a story that needed to be told. As a cover story. Kudos to Business Today for telling it first. Thankfully, unlike the glowing profiles that BT is famous for - including the one featuring infamous stock brocker Harshad Mehta with his Lexus on the cover - this one has a lot of facts. Some well known. And others less so. That ChrysCapital's first fund would have been a disaster but for the pioneering investment in Raman Roy founded BPO firm Spectramind i...

Why did Sony Entertainment Television's CEO quit?

Businessworld has a cover story on the corporate battle that resulted in Kunal Dasgupta, the CEO of Multi Screen Media (formerly Sony Entertainment Television), quitting just a few months before his contract was due to end. Dasgupta’s abrupt exit was the culmination of six years of tension between majority shareholder Sony Pictures Television International (SPTI) that owns 61 per cent of MSM, on one hand, and Atlas Equifinn on the other, which is a consortium of Indian shareholders (Singapore-based Rakesh Aggarwal, World Media Group director Sudesh Iyer, Shemaroo Entertainment Managing Director Raman Maroo, MobiApps Holding’s Jayesh Parekh, B.R. Sule, Sushil Shergil and actor Jackie Shroff ) holding 32 per cent. Capital Japan and some financial institutions own the rest 7 per cent. And of course, the third protagonist is Dasgupta, who walked a tightrope and managed to keep his job for over 14 years despite the fact that neither group of shareholders was too happy with him. Very little...

APEX VC Awards: Chiratae Ventures, Blume Ventures, Elevation Capital, Stride Ventures & Alteria Capital judged best funds of 2021

Press Release Elevation Capital , Chiratae Ventures , Blume Ventures , Stride Ventures and Alteria Capital were voted the top Venture Capital investors in India during 2021. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer. "VCs exist because Entrepreneurs exist and disrupt the ecosystem by creating new businesses. We are very excited to be part of the secular trend of tech disruption that would power India’s journey towards $ 10 Trillion economy over the next decade," said  T C Meenakshi Sundaram, Founder & Vice Chairman, Chiratae Ventures , winner of " VC Fund raise of the Year " award.  " We wish to thank all our entrepreneurs who have chosen to take funding from Chiratae Ventures and investors who have backed us with funds over the past 15 years in this journey.  Congratulations to the entire Chiratae Ventures team and ...