Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Economic Law Practice


Interplay of Goods and Services Tax Laws vis-à-vis Customs Laws

INTRODUCTION
There is no doubt, the introduction of GST has allowed its effects to be felt in other laws, including the Customs Law. This article highlights, via illustrations, the strong interplay of GST and Customs in relation to international trade transactions.

VALUATION
As per the provisions of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Customs Act) read with Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (Customs Valuation Rules), the value of the imported goods is the transaction value of such goods where the buyer and seller of the goods are not related and price is the sole consideration for the sale. Specific additions  to the transaction value are prescribed under  Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules. Given that value of certain services is included in the transaction value of imported goods, there is double taxation per se in respect of those services wherein there is no exemption of IGST on the services which already form part of the transaction value of the imported goods.

Under the GST regime, certain instances of transactions where there is an element of double taxation are given below:
  • Levy of IGST on ocean freight
One of the most contentious issues under the GST regime, which is affecting almost all importers across industries, is whether the importers are liable to pay IGST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on ocean freight paid for services of transportation of goods up to customs station of clearance in India, provided by a person located in a non-taxable territory. This is, even if such freight is a part of Cost Insurance & Freight (CIF) value of imported goods  on  which   the   applicable   Customs  duty along with IGST (as a component of Customs duty) is already  paid.  Various  Advance Rulings have been pronounced clarifying that the importer is liable to pay IGST on RCM basis on ocean freight even if such freight is part of CIF value of imported goods51. While multiple writ petitions have been admitted across various High Courts in India challenging the levy of IGST on ocean freight under RCM inter alia on the ground that the same amounts to double taxation52, the final outcome of the petitions is still awaited.
  • Double taxation of service imports  in  certain other cases
Valuation provisions under Customs require adding value of certain services on to the transaction value of imported goods for the purpose of payment of Customs duty. In line with the same, exemption from payment  of  IGST under RCM has been granted to  royalty and license fee to the extent that the same is included in the value of goods imported on which IGST (as a component of Customs duty)   is paid53. However, no such exemption is currently available qua other services (such as commissions and brokerage, engineering, design work) which form a part of transaction value and wherein Customs duty and IGST (as a component of Customs duty) are already paid. This results in double taxation in respect of  such services.

It is interesting to note that this double taxation goes against the fundamental principle of GST which is to curb cascading effect of taxes.

SCOPE AND AMBIT OF ‘EXPORT’ IN THE CONTEXT OF DUTY-FREE SHOPS (DFS)

Under the erstwhile Value Added Tax and Central Sales Tax laws, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India54 had held that sale of goods by duty free shops at International Airports, which are undisputedly beyond the Customs frontier of  India, cannot be subjected to the levy of Sales Tax.

Under the GST regime, the controversy started with an Advance Ruling pronounced by the Delhi AAR55 wherein a view contrary to that of the apex Court was taken thereby holding that supplies made by a DFS to outbound passengers is amenable to GST as export under GST takes place only when goods cross territorial waters/airspace of India and not merely on crossing customs barriers. A similar view was also adopted by the Bombay High Court56 and Madhya Pradesh High Court57. However, a similar issue also came up for consideration before the Allahabad High Court58 wherein it was held that sales made by DFS constitute as exports as the goods are taken outside India and will not attract GST.

Given the conflicting judgments, recently, the Government of India granted exemption59 to any supply of goods by a retail outlet established  in the departure area of an international airport, beyond the immigration counters, to an outgoing international tourist, from IGST. Interestingly, the exemption from payment of IGST indicates that  the Government considers the supply to be otherwise, amenable to GST. This fact has also been categorically mentioned in a Circular60. Further, the exemption has only been granted to supplies that take place from the departure area and that too to ‘outgoing international tourists’.

The term ‘outgoing international tourist’ has been defined to mean a person not normally resident in India who enters India for a stay of not more than 6 months for legitimate non-immigrant purposes. A natural conclusion to this would be that no exemption will be available to an Indian resident purchasing goods from such retail outlets. This is for the simple reason that they cannot be called as persons who are not normally residents.
The limited exemption is expected to bring additional responsibility on the DFS since they  will now be required to maintain a  separate record of sales to ‘outgoing international tourists’ and also cast a responsibility upon DFS to scrutinize if the passenger qualifies for an exemption or not.

There is no doubt, given so much ambiguity, that GST and customs laws need to align. Amongst other things it will reduce expensive and long drawn litigation. This is where regulators will  need to step in.

Uncertainty in taxation laws, especially interplay between different tax laws and consequently long drawn out litigation, is a pain  point  with corporate India. Clarity on issues, consistency of implementing regulations and  continuous dialogue between government and businesses is the need of the hour.

CLASSIFICATION
In any indirect tax, classification of goods is very vital. The same has wide implications particularly in the case of a multi rate tax structure like GST. Customs adopt the global classification of goods, based on the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) read along with General Rules of Interpretation. The rate Notification of goods under GST regime also adopts the classification, rules of interpretation, section notes and chapter notes as specified under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. However,  certain anomalies in classification are observed with respect to ‘goods’ and ‘services’. For example – any Intellectual Property Right (temporary transfer)  imported into India over a physical medium  is considered as goods for the purposes of Customs whereas under the GST, by virtue of Entry 5(c) of Schedule II of the Central GST Act, 2017 the same is classified as service. This may lead to issues in future if there is a difference in the IGST rate, double taxation , availment of any exemption benefit restricted to goods etc.

Popular posts from this blog

EY Tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 24

Moelis & Company & PwC claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young  (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during 2024, advising 34 deals worth $4.1 Billion. Moelis & Company stood second advising 2 deals worth $3.9 billion. PwC followed with 18 deals worth $3.3 billion. Citi ($2.5 billion across 1 deal) and Advay Capital ($2.3 billion across 1 deal) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals in 2024, Citi  advised $2.5 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield , Advay Capital and Moelis & Company advised the $2.3 Billion acquisition of Care Hospitals by Aster DM Healthcare . Jefferies & Co., JP Morgan and Moelis & Company advised the $1.6 Billion acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines by Mankind Pharma.  Among the other notable M&A deals in Q4 2024, EY advised the $685 million acquisition of ITD Cementation ...

Morgan Stanley tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 2020

Morgan Stanley , which advised the $10.1 Billion strategic investment by Facebook and Google into Reliance Industries' telecom arm Jio platforms (among other Private Equity investments in the company), topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals for 2020. Ambit Corporate Finance - which advised 3 deals worth $4.0 Billion, including Brookfield's $3.7 Billion acquisition of Reliance Tower Infrastructure Trust -  took the second spot. JM Financial ($3.7 Billion across 5 deals), Metta Capital ($3.4 Billion across 3 deals) and ICICI Securities ($3.4 Billion across 2 deals) - all of whom (along with Citi) are advisors to the $3.4 Billion acquisition of Future Group's retail related ventures by Reliance Retail, announced in August - completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A tra...

Everything you wanted to know (and some things you didn't care to know) about ChrysCapital's Ashish Dhawan

New Delhi-based private equity fund ChrysCapital is vastly different from its former avatar, Chrysalis Capital. While Chrysalis began life (in Mumbai) as an venture capital firm focussed on start-up investments, today's ChrysCapital is best know for its late-stage investments (often in already public companies). The fascinating part of this transformation is that one of the fund's original partners - Senior Managing Director Ashish Dhawan - has been firmly in the driver's seat throughout the process. It's a story that needed to be told. As a cover story. Kudos to Business Today for telling it first. Thankfully, unlike the glowing profiles that BT is famous for - including the one featuring infamous stock brocker Harshad Mehta with his Lexus on the cover - this one has a lot of facts. Some well known. And others less so. That ChrysCapital's first fund would have been a disaster but for the pioneering investment in Raman Roy founded BPO firm Spectramind i...

Why did Sony Entertainment Television's CEO quit?

Businessworld has a cover story on the corporate battle that resulted in Kunal Dasgupta, the CEO of Multi Screen Media (formerly Sony Entertainment Television), quitting just a few months before his contract was due to end. Dasgupta’s abrupt exit was the culmination of six years of tension between majority shareholder Sony Pictures Television International (SPTI) that owns 61 per cent of MSM, on one hand, and Atlas Equifinn on the other, which is a consortium of Indian shareholders (Singapore-based Rakesh Aggarwal, World Media Group director Sudesh Iyer, Shemaroo Entertainment Managing Director Raman Maroo, MobiApps Holding’s Jayesh Parekh, B.R. Sule, Sushil Shergil and actor Jackie Shroff ) holding 32 per cent. Capital Japan and some financial institutions own the rest 7 per cent. And of course, the third protagonist is Dasgupta, who walked a tightrope and managed to keep his job for over 14 years despite the fact that neither group of shareholders was too happy with him. Very little...

APEX VC Awards: Chiratae Ventures, Blume Ventures, Elevation Capital, Stride Ventures & Alteria Capital judged best funds of 2021

Press Release Elevation Capital , Chiratae Ventures , Blume Ventures , Stride Ventures and Alteria Capital were voted the top Venture Capital investors in India during 2021. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer. "VCs exist because Entrepreneurs exist and disrupt the ecosystem by creating new businesses. We are very excited to be part of the secular trend of tech disruption that would power India’s journey towards $ 10 Trillion economy over the next decade," said  T C Meenakshi Sundaram, Founder & Vice Chairman, Chiratae Ventures , winner of " VC Fund raise of the Year " award.  " We wish to thank all our entrepreneurs who have chosen to take funding from Chiratae Ventures and investors who have backed us with funds over the past 15 years in this journey.  Congratulations to the entire Chiratae Ventures team and ...