Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Veyrah Law


Once the founders are done negotiating and signing the term sheet, the transaction moves to the process of subscription. The subscription process essentially starts with the due diligence and proceeds with signing the detailed transaction documents.

Broadly speaking, closing of an investment round is subject to satisfactory completion of a ‘due diligence’ exercise by the VC fund and signing of the transaction documents such as share subscription, shareholders’ and employment agreements. Immediately upon execution of the term sheet, a VC fund commences its due diligence process – legal, tax, financial, technical, as they deem fit. Along with conducting the due diligence, the negotiations for the transaction documents are also commenced.

Due diligence

Due diligence is essentially a review conducted on the startup’s business and operations to find out any material issues that the investors need to be aware of before making their investment. Some of the important tasks in a due diligence include legal counsels searching for any potential legal issues, tax professionals reviewing the tax compliances and filings, technical diligence teams taking a deep look at the technology etc. 

Shareholders’ Agreement (SHA)

The SHA, although a material document, seldom has much connection with the due diligence exercise and is essentially a futuristic document. It details the rights and obligations of the VC fund and founders for the management and governance of the startup. It also deals with share transfer restrictions, exit rights of the investor and certain other similar aspects. 

Share Subscription Agreement (SSA)

The SSA records the terms and conditions of issue of shares to the VC fund, and the obligations of each of the parties to facilitate the conclusion of the investment. This document also has the closest link to the due diligence process and the findings from the diligence are addressed in the SSA, to the extent necessary.

The process

How are the findings of the due diligence exercise dealt with by the VC fund/founders? How to negotiate the major issues? And when to rectify the minor ones? Depending on the materiality, the issues must be categorised as major or minor issues. Rarely is an issue highlighted by the due diligence teams a deal-breaker or a walk-away point for the VC fund. Most often, the issues are manageable in one way or the other. The issues highlighted by the due diligence teams are negotiated and dealt with in the SSA. 

The issues arising from due diligence merit a discussion between the founders and the VC fund / their counsels. The discussions are primarily to understand the rationale of the VC fund for determining materiality of an issue. It is in the interest of all concerned parties to achieve a quick and smooth closing. To that extent, it only makes sense to categorise the issues as conditions precedent or post-closing actions based on the materiality of each issue. Of course, some issues could become indemnity related items to be included in the SSA. However, such instances are rare in the initial funding rounds and should be thoroughly negotiated. 

What is a condition precedent?

As the name suggests, conditions precedent are the obligations to be completed by the startup and the founders prior to receipt of funds, i.e., closing of the transaction. What is the obligation on the startup and the founders with respect to these conditions? Simple; to rectify all the issues highlighted by the diligence teams and ensure that there is no liability or loss faced by the startup or the VC fund. Once the SSA and SHA are signed, completion of the conditions precedent under the SSA are the only obligations to be completed prior to receiving funds in the startup’s bank account.

Negotiating the conditions precedent

Quite often it is suggested by the diligence teams to slot all issues under conditions precedent. This is doable but is not useful for anyone. The objective is to ensure that the funding round is closed as soon as possible. So, the rectification of major issues could be categorized as conditions precedent. If such a condition precedent is a time-consuming matter or something which is not in the control of the founders or the startup, it is fair for founders to request that such items be included as a post-closing action. Any action that can be managed without regulatory approvals can be completed as a condition precedent. For example, procuring a certain license should not be a condition precedent. The founders and the startup can be obligated to complete all application formalities as a condition precedent. The post-closing actions may prescribe an outer timeline to procure the final license. This could be a longer timeline since the founders have no control over the timelines by when an authority may issue the final license. 

Additionally, founders and the startup will do well for themselves by being proactive. During the stage of negotiations, they could initiate rectifying certain issues. This will help to ensure that the final list of conditions precedent is a short one. Plus, they will stay ahead of the curve and ensure that the conditions precedent get completed soon; helping in a quick closing of the funding round.

Post-closing actions & ensuring completion

As opposed to the conditions precedent, post-closing actions are obligations to be completed by the founders after closing of the funding round. The rectification of minor issues and completion of compliance related matters are usually categorized as post-closing actions. All post-closing actions should be dealt with in a time bound manner, after closing of the funding round. 

One occurrence which is generally seen amongst founders is the casual nature of dealing with the post-closing actions after the funding round is closed. Just because the funding round is closed does not mean that the items slotted as post-closing actions are of any less importance. It is negotiated in good faith; they should keep their end of the bargain. The founders should ensure that all post-closing actions are completed in a time bound manner. Where they face any difficulty in adhering to the timelines, they must inform and update the VC fund. What founders do not realise is that a casual attitude on this aspect could sometimes put them on the backfoot in subsequent rounds. It is not a good sign for the VC fund / subsequent round investors to notice that post-closing actions of the previous round are outstanding. As a consequence, future investors prescribe stricter timelines and harsher conditionalities. At times, the investors may link any liability flowing from such non-compliance to the founders. 

In the subsequent parts of this series, we will cover other important negotiation points within the SSA, to avoid overtly onerous responsibilities for the startup and founders. We will also discuss the founders’ liabilities under the SSA and how founders can minimize such liabilities.

Authors: Arun Mohanty, Principal Associate; Ajay Joseph, Partner | Veyrah Law

The authors can be reached at

Views expressed above are for information purposes only and should not be considered as a formal

legal opinion or advice on any subject matter therein.

Popular posts from this blog

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry. Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back? Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms

ChrysCapital, Motilal Oswal PE & Sequoia named PE-VC Firms of the Decade

Press Release ChrysCapital, Motilal Oswal Private Equity and Sequoia Capital India have been named the top Private Equity & Venture Capital investors in India during the last decade, as part of Venture Intelligence’s APEX Awards. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer.  While ChrysCapital won the “Private Equity Investor of the Decade” award, Motilal Oswal Private Equity was feted as India’s “Growth Capital Investor of the Decade”. The Indian arm of the storied Silicon Valley VC firm, Sequoia Capital, was named the country’s “Venture Capital Investor of the Decade”. The APEX Awardees are selected based on both Self Nomination by the participating PE-VC firms as well as "crowd sourced" nominations and voting from the Limited Partner, PE-VC and advisory communities. (The main criteria were Exit Track Record, New Fund Raises & Fo

PE-VC Investments in 2021 hit all time high of $63 Billion

Press Release: Private Equity - Venture Capital (PE-VC) firms invested a record $63 Billion (across 1,202 deals) in Indian companies during 2021, registering  a 57% rise over the   $39.9 Billion (across 913 deals) invested in the previous year ,  reports  Venture Intelligence , a research service focused on private company financials, transactions, and their valuations. (Note: These figures include Venture Capital type investments, but exclude PE investments in Real Estate). India minted a total of 44 " Unicorn"  companies (VC-funded startups valued at $1 Billion or more)  in 2021, 15 of them during Q4'21. The $23.4 Billion invested into the Information Technology sector dominated list of  Unicorns  accounted for more than 37% of the overall value of PE-VC investments in 2021. The October-December 2021 quarter (Q4'21) saw over $5 Billion (across 25 deals) being invested in such companies.  2021 witnessed eight investments worth $1 Billion or more, led by Flipkart'

PE Investments vault 52% to record $49 Billion during first 9 months of 2021

Press Release Private Equity - Venture Capital (PE-VC) firms invested a record $49 Billion (across 840 deals) in Indian companies during the first 9 months of 2021,  shows data from  Venture Intelligence , a research service focused on private company financials, transactions and their valuations. These figures, which have already surpassed the full year investment total of $39.5 Billion (across 892 deals) in the entire of 2020, represent a 52% increase over the   $32.2 Billion (across 651 deals) in  the first nine months  of 2020. (Note: These figures include Venture Capital type investments, but exclude PE investments in Real Estate). The $20 Billion investments in  Unicorns  (VC-funded startups valued at $1 Billion or more) account for close to 41% of the value pie in 2021 thus far. The July-September 2021 quarter (Q3'21) saw over $10 Billion (across 28 deals) being invested in such companies. India has minted a total of 29 Unicorns   in the first 9 months of 2021 - 13 of which

EY tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in first 9 months of 2021

Kotak Mahindra Capital and Avendus claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during the first nine months of 2021, advising 23 qualifying deals worth $8.2 Billion. Kotak Mahindra Capital ($7.9 Billion across 8 deals) and Avendus ($5.7 Billion across 7 deals) took the second and third spots respectively. JM Financial ($1.9 Billion across 6 deals) and Deloitte ($1.8 Billion across 3 deals) completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Financial and Legal Advisory firms. Among the largest deals in Q3 2021, Avendus and Kotak Mahindra Capital advised the  acquisition of digital payments provider Billdesk by PayU . DC Advisory  advised Edtech unicorn Byju’s $600 million acquisition of upskilling platform Great L