Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Veyrah Law

VC SERIES | Part I – The First Institutional Investor !


Over the last few decades while India went through radical changes, so did the world of venture capital (VC) financing for start-ups. India has emerged as the hotspot for unicorns right after the US and China. Multiple investments and acquisitions are a norm in the fast-paced start-up ecosystem. While seasoned institutional investors are well versed with the legalities of VC financing, first-time founders are often struggling to find their feet in the journey. To some extent, even first-time investors in the Indian market grapple with reconciling global market standards with the nuances of the Indian market.  However, first-time investors still have an upper hand because of their in-house and external legal and business teams. To that extent, some parts of our series are directed more towards offering guidance to founders. As we share our expertise and learnings around funding rounds, we hope the series will be helpful for the first-time entrepreneur, as well as a value add for the first-time investor. 

Most start-up founders are ‘bootstrapped’ or are funded by friends, family and acquaintances. An important consideration is the stage at which they should approach potential institutional investors. It should certainly be well before their initial funding is exhausted. We have listed down below some preliminary steps that founders should take while seeking out their first set of institutional investors to the stage of getting their first ‘term sheet’.

Get the business started

Firstly, the founders need to ensure that they start off their business, at whatever possible scale; get it up and running. The initial funds should be deployed largely for gaining customer traction. The practical challenges that they may encounter will only be known to them once they have taken off from the ground. This will help them perfect their product offering and help in making a more informed pitch to the investors.

The right investors

Secondly, it is important for founders to identify the leading and potential investors of their sector. Each VC fund will usually have its focus areas for investment based on their investment strategy and as marketed to their limited partners. As the origins of venture capital go, they predominantly only invest in technology start-ups which have a potential to scale rapidly. Within the technology sector, various VC funds will further focus their investments on certain sectors. It very often happens that the founders end up knocking on the wrong doors. It is important that founders do a market study and approach the correct investors for their business. 

When to raise?

Most founders have heard terms such as incubator, angel investor, seed investor, Series A round, Series B round etc. It is essential for founders to understand the stage which their company has achieved and accordingly figure out the type and scale of funding they need. Generally speaking, incubator, seed rounds, angel rounds are all investments made into a company at its nascent stage. Series A, Series B, etc., are the subsequent funding rounds and nomenclatures indicating the growth of a company. There are various VC funds investing into a company at an early stage. Depending on the growth of the startup, founders could approach such VC funds for their first funding round. 

How much to raise?

Only because VC funds have taken keen interest in the startup and are willing to sign a fat cheque, does not mean that the founders should raise any amount. The effort should be to raise the desired amount at the best valuation possible. It is usually in the initial rounds that founders undergo the maximum dilution. So, founders need to strike the right balance with raising just the amount of funds needed to scale operations. A much better valuation can be commanded during subsequent rounds. Or else within a few rounds the founders would be reduced to a minority holding status. Of course, all of this really depends on the cash intensive nature of the business in question and the burn rate. The VC environment is still not ready to accept shares with special controlling rights for founders unlike the trend in the western countries. Founders should be mindful of this while raising funds in the initial stages.

The investment banker

Another alternative is for founders to appoint an investment banker to help them navigate through their first funding. Setting up a business plan, preparing an attractive pitch deck for investors, crunching numbers etc., are all expertise that an investment banker brings to the table. However, many reputed investment banking practices may not take up smaller size funding mandates. In such situations the best option would be boutique investment banks that have sector specialization. But usually, start-ups manage the funding rounds until Series A or Series B without the assistance of an investment banker for the fund raise. They may however use professional assistance for preparing the investor deck and related documents. 

Understanding the investor

Founders also need to understand their investor, their nature of discussions, their risk appetite, and the principal who takes call on the deal commercials. On certain aspects, foreign investor teams are usually more flexible to deal with as compared to domestic investors. Once commercials are agreed with foreign investors, they tend to be more flexible with concluding negotiations for legal documents and ensuring ‘money in the bank’. While domestic investors are quick to close out on commercials, their teams could be a bit rigid about modifying their standard legal documents. But once investments are concluded almost all institutional funds (domestic or foreign) provide complete operational flexibility to founder teams.

Securing a term sheet

Once the founders have started discussions with VC funds for their first funding round, the first important milestone would be getting a term sheet. The term sheet forms the basis of discussions and negotiations which eventually translates into the long-form transaction documents. In that sense, the term sheet is a critical inflection point in the life cycle of a funding round.

What is the importance of the term sheet in the life cycle of a funding round? Are the founders allowed to negotiate and push back on provisions in the term sheet? How should they deal with it? Importance of legal jargons in the term sheet? We will discuss these and more in the next article of this series.

Arun Mohanty | Principal Associate, Veyrah Law; Ajay Joseph | Partner, Veyrah Law

Views expressed above are for information purposes only and should not be considered as a formal legal opinion or advice on any subject matter therein.


Popular posts from this blog

PE-VC investments decline 8% to $6.2 B in Q1'24

Press Release: Private Equity - Venture Capital (PE-VC) firms invested over $6.2 Billion (across 205 deals) in Indian companies during the first three months of 2024, shows data from  Venture Intelligence , a research service focused on private company financials, transactions, and their valuations. (Note: These figures include Venture Capital type investments, but exclude PE investments in Real Estate). The investment amount represents a 8% fall over the $6.7 Billion (across 242 deals) invested in the same period during 2023 and also down by 6% when compared to the immediate previous quarter (which witnessed $6.6 Billion being invested across 200 deals). Deal volumes in Q1'24 also declined 15% compared to Q1'23 and were up by 3% compared to the immediate previous quarter.  Q1’24 witnessed 8 mega deals ($100 M+ rounds) worth $3.5 Billion, compared to 17 such investments (worth $3.6 Billion) in Q1’23 and 15 such deals (worth $4.1 Billion) in the immediate previous quarter....

Avendus tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to PE deals in H1'24

Citi and Ambit claim the No.2&3 slots Avendus topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to Private Equity Transactions in H1’2024 advising 12 deals worth $2.4 Billion. Citi stood second, having advised 1 deal worth $2 Billion. Ambit followed with 7 deals worth $797 million. Kotak Mahindra Capital ($735 million across 2 deals) and Ernst & Young ($657 million across 7 deals) completed the top five for H1’ 2024. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Financial and Legal Advisory firms. Among the larger deals in the latest quarter, Citi, KPMG , Ernst & Young advised $2 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield . Avendus, Ernst & Young, JM Financial, Barclays and KPMG advised $ 554 million acquisition of Shriram Housing Finance by Warb...

AZB tops League Table for Legal Advisors to PE deals in H1’24

Trilegal and Khaitan & Co. claim the No.2 & No.3 slots AZB & Partners (AZB) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Legal Advisor to Private Equity Transactions in H1 2024 advising 41 deals worth $5.4 Billion. It was followed by Trilegal ($5.1 Billion across 54 deals) and Khaitan & Co. (4.8 Billion across 46 deals) in the second and third spot respectively. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) ($2.9 Billion across 34 deals) and Talwar Thakore & Associates ($2.4 Billion across 9 deals) completed the top five. Among the larger Private Equity deals during H1’2024, Khaitan & Co., Talwar Thakore & Associates, S&R Associates ,and Trilegal a dvised the $2 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield which was the largest PE-VC investment in 2024 . AZB advised the $900 Million acquisition of Altimetrik by TPG Capital and the $840 Million acquisition of Healthium Medtech by KKR . Resolut Partners , Khaitan & ...

Citi tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in H1'24

  Ernst & Young and Avendus claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Citi , which advised the  $2 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield,  topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A Deals   during H1 2024. Ernst & Young stood second advising 8 deals worth $1.5 billion. Avendus followed with 7 deals worth $1.2 billion. KPMG ($1.1 billion across 5 deals) and JM Financial ($900 million across 4 deals) completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Financial and Legal Advisory firms. Among the other larger M&A deals in H1 2024 (other than the  ATC-Brookfield deal) , Ernst & Young, KPMG and Deloitte advised $1.1 Billion acquisition in PNC Infratech 12 Road Projects by Highways Infrastructure Tr...

AZB & Partners tops League Table for Legal Advisors to M&A deals in H1’24

Khaitan & Co. and J Sagar Associates claim the No.2 & No.3 slots AZB & Partners topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Legal Advisor to M&A Transactions during H1 2024 advising 37 deals worth $14.8 Billion. It was followed by Khaitan & Co. ($12.8 Billion across 32 deals) and J Sagar Associates (JSA) ($9.8 Billion across 13 deals). Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) ($6.2 Billion across 38 deals) and Trilegal ($4.8 Billion across 20 deals) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals during H1 2024, AZB, JSA and Khaitan & Co. advised $8.5 Billion acquisition of Disney Hotstar by Reliance Jio . S&R Associates , Talwar Thakore & Associates (TTA), Khaitan & Co. and Trilegal advised the $2 Billion buyout deal   of  ATC India by Canadian infrastructure investor Brookfield Asset Management . CAM advised the $1.3 Billion in the acquisition of a  further  stake in Ambuja Cement  by Adani Enterprises . Among fo...