Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by Veyrah Law

VC SERIES | Part II – The Term Sheet!

In the last article of this series, we discussed certain basic aspects to be kept in mind by founders in their run up to the first funding round. The immediate next objective would be to get a term sheet. Being offered a term sheet from a VC fund is no small feat. Till such time, all that the founders had been discussing with the VC fund was money – the amount of funding the startup needs and the possible valuation of the startup. But the term sheet comes with certain other terms and conditions – what are those terms and conditions? 

Before we dive into the terms and conditions of a term sheet, it is essential to understand the timelines and strategy to deal with a term sheet. Most VC funds may imply to founders that the term sheet is a ‘take it or leave it’ offer. Is that correct? – usually not. Also, likely that the VC funds will expect the founders to execute the term sheet within a day. Will the founders not be given time to go back and check with their in-house and external teams? – certainly. But, keep in mind, the sooner the founders sign it, the better. 

Term sheet – the halfway mark

A term sheet contains indicative set of terms and conditions on which a VC fund intends to invest into a startup company. Getting an offer from a VC fund in the form of a term sheet is a major milestone achieved by founders. Many first-time founders do not realize that each VC fund has to follow their own set of internal compliances, approvals etc., before rolling out a term sheet to an investee company. It is only in very rare instances, owing to some major concerns, that VC funds will walk away from a deal after the term sheet is signed. In that sense, getting a term sheet signed is halfway through for the founders. It signifies that the investors are keen to participate in the startup’s business and its product/service. That is also why it is important that founders conclude negotiations and sign the term sheet at the earliest.

Signing the term sheet

In some instances, founders get overwhelmed on receiving a term sheet from a VC fund and end up signing the dotted line without understanding its implications. The term sheet sets the groundwork for the broad principles that will form the basis of the first round of agreements that founders will sign. Founders will do well to realize that the first round of documents also forms the starting point for every subsequent round of negotiations for future funding rounds. Founders’ ability to negotiate is dependent on various factors such as – the amount of interest the investors have garnered in the company’s product/services, the size of the round, the market standard vis-à-vis the ticket size, other co-investors and their asks etc. That said, most term sheets in India are standard and barring certain key provisions it should not be controversial. 

Understanding the term sheet

Founders should clearly understand the commercials that have been agreed and the basis on which investments are being made. It is also useful to remember that most VC funds would have made multiple investments already in other start-ups. They are also aware that there is broadly an acceptable market standard for most provisions. So, even if the starting position on some provisions may be a bit aggressive, founders will have the leeway to push back towards more market standard provisions.

Understanding market standards

It is important to gather a generic understanding on the customary provisions in the market. The market standard for each funding round is different. Rights that can be claimed in a Series C round may not be possible in a Series A round. Merely because some other startup or founder has got some special rights does not mean that every startup or founder can claim them. The risk position for the VC fund is higher in the early rounds. As the startup grows and builds its value, the initial investors get de-risked. To that extent founders need to build in better protections for themselves in future rounds, as the business grows in value.

Key provisions of the term sheet

Keeping the above in mind, apart from certain standard provisions (such as jurisdiction, exclusivity and confidentiality), all other terms in a term sheet are legally non-binding. Generally, in the first round, the ability to negotiate may be limited. Therefore, choose your battles – the founders should only put up material points for negotiation at the term sheet stage and leave the details to be discussed in the definitive agreements. To give you a bird’s eye view, some of the material points which the founders should review thoroughly are liquidation preference, governance rights, founders’ liabilities and restrictions and exit obligations. While it is important to keep the provisions in the term sheet at a conceptual level, the founders should not agree to something in the term sheet on the assumption that it can be reversed during negotiation of the definitive agreements. It is not unheard of for investors to accommodate any deviations from the term sheet if there are genuine concerns. But it is always an uphill task to reverse or materially deviate from a position agreed in the term sheet. 

Founders need to balance their interests but at the same time ensure that they get the term sheet signed at the earliest. A prior understanding of the various terms and market standards on some concepts would help them in achieving this balance. In the subsequent parts of this series, we will touch upon each of the terms, their meanings, key negotiation points, the agreed market standard with respect to each provision and the ideal balanced outcome.

Arun Mohanty | Principal Associate, Veyrah Law; Ajay Joseph | Partner, Veyrah Law

Views expressed above are for information purposes only and should not be considered as a formal legal opinion or advice on any subject matter therein.

Popular posts from this blog

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry. Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back? Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms

ChrysCapital, Motilal Oswal PE & Sequoia named PE-VC Firms of the Decade

Press Release ChrysCapital, Motilal Oswal Private Equity and Sequoia Capital India have been named the top Private Equity & Venture Capital investors in India during the last decade, as part of Venture Intelligence’s APEX Awards. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer.  While ChrysCapital won the “Private Equity Investor of the Decade” award, Motilal Oswal Private Equity was feted as India’s “Growth Capital Investor of the Decade”. The Indian arm of the storied Silicon Valley VC firm, Sequoia Capital, was named the country’s “Venture Capital Investor of the Decade”. The APEX Awardees are selected based on both Self Nomination by the participating PE-VC firms as well as "crowd sourced" nominations and voting from the Limited Partner, PE-VC and advisory communities. (The main criteria were Exit Track Record, New Fund Raises & Fo

Ambit tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to Private Equity deals in 2019

Ambit Corporate Finance topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to Private Equity Transactions for the year 2019. Ambit advised PE deals worth $2.4 Billion (across 4 qualifying transactions) during the period. Citi ($1.1 Billion across 2 deals) and  Avendus  ($969 million across 12 deals) took the second and third spot. Edelweiss Financial Services ($758 million across 9 deals) and  PwC  ($708 million across 15 deals) completed the top five in 2019.  The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on value of PE and M&A transactions advised by Financial and Legal Advisory firms. Ambit Corporate Finance advised the $1.9 Billion buyout of Pipeline Infrastructure from Reliance Industries   by Brookfield Asset Management  and the IFC and I Squared Capital-backed   Cube Highways' acquisition of Delhi-Agra Toll Road from Reliance Infrastructu

Inventus, Sixth Sense, Blume & Norwest win Apex'20 Venture Capital Awards

Inventus Capital Partners, Sixth Sense Ventures, Blume Ventures and Norwest Venture Partners were voted the top Venture Capital investors in India during 2019. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer. Other 2019 winners in the VC segment included  Axilor Ventures which was voted   the  Accelerator of the Year for the second year running, 3one4 Capital (VC Fund Raise of the Year) and Innoven Capital (Venture Debt firm of the Year). The APEX Awardees are selected based on both Self Nomination by the participating PE-VC firms as well as "crowd sourced" nominations and voting from the Limited Partner, PE-VC and advisory communities. (The main criteria are Exit Track Record, New Fund Raises & Follow-on Funding Rounds for Portfolio Companies).    " It is an honour to be recognised by entrepreneurs and investors as

PE-VC investments in 2020 cross $39-B to create a "hat trick" of all time highs

Press Release:  Private Equity - Venture Capital (PE-VC) firms, shrugged off the pandemic induced blues, to invest a record $39.2 Billion in Indian companies (across 814 deals) in 2020,  shows data from  Venture Intelligence  - a research service focused on private company financials, transactions, and their valuations. The $17.3 Billion* invested by US-headquartered private equity and other global sovereign wealth funds in Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) Group firms - including in the telecom-focused holding company  Jio Platforms ($9.9 Billion), Reliance Retail ($6.4 Billion), and  Reliance Digital Fibre Infrastructure Trust ($1 Billion) - accounted for 44% of the total PE-VC investment value in 2020. (*This figure excludes the $10.2 Billion in strategic investments by Silicon Valley tech giants Google and Facebook in Jio Platforms). On the back of the RIL deals, PE-VC investments in 2020 grew 6.6% over the   $36.3 Billion (across 1012 deals) invested in 2019 and helped create a