Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by SAMVĀD: PARTNERS

UPDATE ON WITHDRAWAL OF THE PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION BILL, 2019

Background

As of today, India does not have a comprehensive, stand-alone legislation that addresses data protection in the country unlike the European Union GDPR. It is mainly governed by the Information Technology Act of 2000 and Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011 along with sectoral regulations that address protection of data collected by them in their respective sectors, such as Reserve Bank of India, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India, etc.

However, the Personal Data Protection Bill (‘PDP Bill’) was designed by a subcommittee appointed under the chairmanship of Justice Sri Krishna in 2018 to address the lack of a stand-alone data protection legislation. It was approved in December 2019 and was sent to be reviewed by the Joint Parliamentary Committee (‘JPC’). The Report of the JPC was tabled in November 2021 capturing multiple recommendations. To see our previous update on PDP Bill including the recommendations of the JPC in 2021, please refer here.

Debate over passing of the PDP Bill

There has been significant debate over passing of the PDP Bill in the past four years as it went through multiple scrutinizations, including scrutinization from the JPC, the public and various tech companies. Some believe that this delay is concerning as India is one of the largest Internet driven markets in the world and there is no form of regulatory framework that explicitly protects people’s privacy. They believe it is better to have some law instead of no law at this point.[1] On the other hand, some stakeholders criticized the PDP Bill suggesting that many provisions suggested such as data localization would be detrimental to their businesses. Start-ups believe that the PDP Bill is too compliance-intensive and certain civil society groups were against the surveillance-enabling provisions.

Withdrawal of the Bill

The Government on Wednesday (August 3, 2021) withdrew the PDP Bill stating that a ‘comprehensive legal framework’ is being worked upon and will be presented as a new bill. This new bill is supposed to provide a legal framework to regulate a much broader spectrum of activities in the online space, incorporating separate laws on data privacy, the overall internet ecosystem, cybersecurity and utilising non-personal data to amplify innovation in the country. The Bill is proposed to be tabled in the Winter Session.

Union Minister for Electronics and Information Technology, Ashwini Vaishnaw explained the reason behind the withdrawal of the PDP via a note circulated to the Members of the Parliament. The note stated that there were 81 amendments proposed and 12 recommendations made on the framework and thus, it has been proposed that a new Bill will be presented that fits into the Comprehensive legal framework. Post withdrawal of Bill, Minister of State for IT, Rajeev Chandrashekhar suggested that the new comprehensive framework will be global standard laws including digital privacy laws for contemporary and future challenges.[2] Members of the JPC too seems to have welcomed this decision, suggesting a new legislation is better than making 81 amendments.

Concluding remarks

The dilemma is whether some law targeted at the immediate need for comprehensive Indian data regulation would have been better than no law, or whether it is better to wait for a new legislation altogether, encompassing a broader scope, addressing the JPC suggestions as well as adapting to the ongoing changes in the local and global technology environment? The provisions of the new draft legislation that is hopefully to be proposed soon will possibly answer part of the question.

*****

*This is an update for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact us if you require further clarification on this subject.  





ROHAN K GEORGE

Partner, Chennai

ANIETIA TOM

Associate, Bengaluru


Popular posts from this blog

EY Tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 24

Moelis & Company & PwC claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young  (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during 2024, advising 34 deals worth $4.1 Billion. Moelis & Company stood second advising 2 deals worth $3.9 billion. PwC followed with 18 deals worth $3.3 billion. Citi ($2.5 billion across 1 deal) and Advay Capital ($2.3 billion across 1 deal) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals in 2024, Citi  advised $2.5 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield , Advay Capital and Moelis & Company advised the $2.3 Billion acquisition of Care Hospitals by Aster DM Healthcare . Jefferies & Co., JP Morgan and Moelis & Company advised the $1.6 Billion acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines by Mankind Pharma.  Among the other notable M&A deals in Q4 2024, EY advised the $685 million acquisition of ITD Cementation ...

Morgan Stanley tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 2020

Morgan Stanley , which advised the $10.1 Billion strategic investment by Facebook and Google into Reliance Industries' telecom arm Jio platforms (among other Private Equity investments in the company), topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals for 2020. Ambit Corporate Finance - which advised 3 deals worth $4.0 Billion, including Brookfield's $3.7 Billion acquisition of Reliance Tower Infrastructure Trust -  took the second spot. JM Financial ($3.7 Billion across 5 deals), Metta Capital ($3.4 Billion across 3 deals) and ICICI Securities ($3.4 Billion across 2 deals) - all of whom (along with Citi) are advisors to the $3.4 Billion acquisition of Future Group's retail related ventures by Reliance Retail, announced in August - completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A tra...

Everything you wanted to know (and some things you didn't care to know) about ChrysCapital's Ashish Dhawan

New Delhi-based private equity fund ChrysCapital is vastly different from its former avatar, Chrysalis Capital. While Chrysalis began life (in Mumbai) as an venture capital firm focussed on start-up investments, today's ChrysCapital is best know for its late-stage investments (often in already public companies). The fascinating part of this transformation is that one of the fund's original partners - Senior Managing Director Ashish Dhawan - has been firmly in the driver's seat throughout the process. It's a story that needed to be told. As a cover story. Kudos to Business Today for telling it first. Thankfully, unlike the glowing profiles that BT is famous for - including the one featuring infamous stock brocker Harshad Mehta with his Lexus on the cover - this one has a lot of facts. Some well known. And others less so. That ChrysCapital's first fund would have been a disaster but for the pioneering investment in Raman Roy founded BPO firm Spectramind i...

Why did Sony Entertainment Television's CEO quit?

Businessworld has a cover story on the corporate battle that resulted in Kunal Dasgupta, the CEO of Multi Screen Media (formerly Sony Entertainment Television), quitting just a few months before his contract was due to end. Dasgupta’s abrupt exit was the culmination of six years of tension between majority shareholder Sony Pictures Television International (SPTI) that owns 61 per cent of MSM, on one hand, and Atlas Equifinn on the other, which is a consortium of Indian shareholders (Singapore-based Rakesh Aggarwal, World Media Group director Sudesh Iyer, Shemaroo Entertainment Managing Director Raman Maroo, MobiApps Holding’s Jayesh Parekh, B.R. Sule, Sushil Shergil and actor Jackie Shroff ) holding 32 per cent. Capital Japan and some financial institutions own the rest 7 per cent. And of course, the third protagonist is Dasgupta, who walked a tightrope and managed to keep his job for over 14 years despite the fact that neither group of shareholders was too happy with him. Very little...

VC Interview: Shailendra Singh of Sequoia Capital India

In a recent interview to Venture Intelligence, Shailendra Singh discussed some of the firm’s newer investments in the early stage segment including in the online payments space, the progress at a few existing portfolio companies and the active role the firm is playing in helping its portfolio companies scale and succeed in India and globally. Prior to joining the firm in 2006, Singh was a strategy consultant at Bain & Company in New York and before that, an entrepreneur in the digital media industry. Venture Intelligence: How does Sequoia go about identifying potential early stage investments in India? Is there anything different you are doing today than, say, a couple of years back? Shailendra Singh: There is a lot more focus on technology investing and early stage investing. In general, as you might remember a few years ago, we were doing primarily growth investing but in the past 18-odd months, we have had a very strong focus on early stage and that’s continuing. In terms...