Skip to main content

Legal Capsule by LexCounsel


FEMA Overhaul and Bifurcation of Debt and Non- Debt Instruments


The Finance Act of 2015 had proposed certain amendments to the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”). After a long delay, the amendments have finally been notified by the Central Government on October 15, 2019. Pursuant to the notification, the Central Government issued the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (“NDI Rules”) and Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) (Amendment) Rules, 2019 (“Amendment Rules”) (collectively referred to as “Rules”) and the RBI issued the Foreign Exchange Management (Debt Instrument) Regulations, 2019 (“Debt Regulations”) and the Foreign Exchange Management (Mode of Payment and Reporting of Non-Debt Instruments) Regulations, 2019.

The Rules and the Debt Regulations supersede the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer of Issue of Security by a Person Resident outside India) Regulations, 2017 (“TISPRO”) and the Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2018. Under the amended regime, a new classification of debt instruments and non-debt instruments have been introduced wherein the RBI is empowered to frame regulations with respect to debt instruments and the Central Government is empowered to frame rules with respect to non-debt instruments.

Key features of the Rules and the Debt Regulations are as follows:

1. Equity instruments: The term “capital instruments” used in TISPRO stands replaced by the term “equity instruments” in the Rules.

2. Debt and Non-Debt Instruments: The Rules provides for an exhaustive list for instruments which are considered as non-debt instruments and includes (i) all investments in equity instruments in incorporated entities: public, private, listed and unlisted; (ii) capital participation in LLP; (iii) all instruments of investment recognised in the foreign direct investment (“FDI”) policy; (iv) investment in units of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), Real Estate Investment Trust (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvIts); (v) investment in units of mutual funds or Exchange-Traded Fund (ETFs) which invest more than fifty per cent in equity; (vi) junior-most layer (i.e. equity tranche) of securitisation structure; (vii) acquisition, sale or dealing directly in immovable property; (viii) contribution to trusts; and (ix) depository receipts issued against equity instruments.

As per the Rules, debt instruments shall include all instruments other than non-debt instruments. The Debt Regulations also separately give examples of certain debt instruments (such as dated government securities/ treasury bills; non-convertible debentures/ bonds issued by an Indian company; commercial papers issued by an Indian company etc.) which can be acquired by foreign portfolio investors, non-resident Indians, foreign central banks etc. 

3. Hybrid Instruments: A definition of “hybrid instruments” has been introduced in the Rules which includes instruments such as optionally or partially convertible preference shares or debentures and other such instruments as specified by the Central Government from time to time, which can be issued by an Indian company or trust to a person resident outside India. However, the above term has not been used in the Rules and the reason for inclusion of this definition is not clear.

4. Consultation with Central Government: As provided under the TISPRO, the Rules also provide that no person resident outside India shall make any investments in India save as otherwise provided in the FEMA or rules or regulations made thereunder. For cases falling outside the FEMA’s general permission regime, the applicant can approach the RBI for approval. Interestingly, the RBI will now have to consult with the Central Government with regard to applications/cases for (a) permitting a person resident outside India to make any investment in India; (b) permitting an Indian entity or an investment vehicle, or a venture capital fund or a firm or an association of persons or a proprietary concern to receive any investment in India from a person resident outside India or to record such investment; (c) framing of pricing guidelines, documentation and reporting requirements in case of transfer of equity instruments of an Indian company by or to a person resident outside India. This provision for consultation by RBI with the Central Government is a new requirement and could possibly have an impact on the autonomy of exercise of powers by the RBI.

5. Foreign Portfolio Investors (“FPIs”):

(i) With effect from April 1, 2020, the aggregate limit for investments to be made by FPIs in an Indian company shall be the sectoral cap/statutory ceiling applicable for the Indian company.

(ii) An Indian company by means of a resolution of the Board of Directors and a special resolution of the members may (i) on or before March 31, 2020, decrease such aggregate limit for investments by FPIs to a lower threshold to 24% or 49% or 74%; or (ii) increase its aggregate limit, if such company had decreased the same, to the aggregate limit of 49% or 74% or the sectoral cap/statutory ceiling.

(iii) Once the aggregate limit of FPI investment is increased the same cannot be reduced to a lower threshold by the company.

(iv) FPIs investing in breach of the prescribed limits will have the option to divest their excess holdings within a period of 5 trading days from the date of settlement of the trade causing the breach. Failure to divest within the aforesaid period will lead to the entire investment being categorised as FDI and the FPI would need to bring the same to the notice of the depositories as well as the concerned investee company for effecting the necessary changes in their records.

(v) The aggregate limit of FPI investment in an Indian company in a sector where FDI is prohibited shall be 24%.

(vi) FPIs can now invest in units of mutual funds and Category III AIFs or offshore fund for which no objection is issued under the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996 and which in turn invests more than 50% in equity instruments on repatriation basis. FPIs may also invest in REITs and InvIts on repatriation basis.

6. Other Changes

(i) E-Commerce: The Rules provide that e-commerce activities can be conducted only by companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 or the Companies Act, 2013. Under the earlier regime, foreign companies under Section 2(42) of the Companies Act, 2013 or an office, branch or agency in India as provided in Section 2 (v) (iii) of FEMA, 1999, owned or controlled by a person resident outside India and conducting e-commerce business were also included. Furthermore, every e-commerce marketplace entity with FDI is required to obtain and maintain a report of a statutory auditor by September 30 every year confirming compliance with e-commerce regulations in the preceding financial year.

(ii)  Foreign Venture Capital Investor (“FVCI”): FVCIs can invest in equity or equity linked instrument or debt instrument issued by start-ups irrespective of the sector in which the start-up is engaged. Under TISPRO, FVCIs could invest in “securities” issued by start-ups but it wasn’t clear if the term “securities” was limited to capital instruments or not.


(iii) Investment by NRIs and OCIs: NRIs and OCIs can now purchase or sell units, without any limit, of mutual funds which invest more than 50% in equity. NRIs and OCIs can also subscribe to the National Pension System administered by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority, subject to eligibility.


(iv) Pre-incorporation/pre-operative expenses: The explanation under TISPRO as to amounts which will constitute pre-incorporation/pre-operative expenses and against which capital instruments could be issued by a wholly owned subsidiary to its holding non-resident entity has been omitted under the Rules.

Conclusion:

The bifurcation of power and roles concerning foreign exchange transactions between the Central Government and the RBI is intended to bring efficiency and avoid any conflict with respect to foreign exchange transactions. However, it appears that going forward the Government could possibly exercise greater control over the foreign exchange transactions, and it can lead to dilution of authority of the RBI on such issues with possibly a longer approval process for the applicants. As the above regulations are yet to be incorporated in the RBI’s master directions and the FDI policy, the Rules and Debt Regulations are yet to be put in active implementation. We will continue to bring more updates on the Rules and the interpretation/implementation issues in our future write-ups.

If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered herein, please contact:

Ms. Seema Jhingan, Partner
(sjhingan@lexcounsel.in)

Mr.Tanmay Mohanty, Associate
(tmohanty@lexcounsel.in)


Popular posts from this blog

EY Tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 24

Moelis & Company & PwC claim the No.2 & No.3 slots Ernst & Young  (EY) topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals   during 2024, advising 34 deals worth $4.1 Billion. Moelis & Company stood second advising 2 deals worth $3.9 billion. PwC followed with 18 deals worth $3.3 billion. Citi ($2.5 billion across 1 deal) and Advay Capital ($2.3 billion across 1 deal) completed the top five. Among the largest M&A deals in 2024, Citi  advised $2.5 Billion acquisition of the Indian business of American Tower Corporation by Brookfield , Advay Capital and Moelis & Company advised the $2.3 Billion acquisition of Care Hospitals by Aster DM Healthcare . Jefferies & Co., JP Morgan and Moelis & Company advised the $1.6 Billion acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines by Mankind Pharma.  Among the other notable M&A deals in Q4 2024, EY advised the $685 million acquisition of ITD Cementation ...

Morgan Stanley tops League Table for Transaction Advisors to M&A deals in 2020

Morgan Stanley , which advised the $10.1 Billion strategic investment by Facebook and Google into Reliance Industries' telecom arm Jio platforms (among other Private Equity investments in the company), topped the Venture Intelligence League Table for Transaction Advisor to M&A Deals for 2020. Ambit Corporate Finance - which advised 3 deals worth $4.0 Billion, including Brookfield's $3.7 Billion acquisition of Reliance Tower Infrastructure Trust -  took the second spot. JM Financial ($3.7 Billion across 5 deals), Metta Capital ($3.4 Billion across 3 deals) and ICICI Securities ($3.4 Billion across 2 deals) - all of whom (along with Citi) are advisors to the $3.4 Billion acquisition of Future Group's retail related ventures by Reliance Retail, announced in August - completed the top five. The  Venture Intelligence League Tables , the first such initiative exclusively tracking transactions involving India-based companies, are based on the value of PE and M&A tra...

Everything you wanted to know (and some things you didn't care to know) about ChrysCapital's Ashish Dhawan

New Delhi-based private equity fund ChrysCapital is vastly different from its former avatar, Chrysalis Capital. While Chrysalis began life (in Mumbai) as an venture capital firm focussed on start-up investments, today's ChrysCapital is best know for its late-stage investments (often in already public companies). The fascinating part of this transformation is that one of the fund's original partners - Senior Managing Director Ashish Dhawan - has been firmly in the driver's seat throughout the process. It's a story that needed to be told. As a cover story. Kudos to Business Today for telling it first. Thankfully, unlike the glowing profiles that BT is famous for - including the one featuring infamous stock brocker Harshad Mehta with his Lexus on the cover - this one has a lot of facts. Some well known. And others less so. That ChrysCapital's first fund would have been a disaster but for the pioneering investment in Raman Roy founded BPO firm Spectramind i...

Why did Sony Entertainment Television's CEO quit?

Businessworld has a cover story on the corporate battle that resulted in Kunal Dasgupta, the CEO of Multi Screen Media (formerly Sony Entertainment Television), quitting just a few months before his contract was due to end. Dasgupta’s abrupt exit was the culmination of six years of tension between majority shareholder Sony Pictures Television International (SPTI) that owns 61 per cent of MSM, on one hand, and Atlas Equifinn on the other, which is a consortium of Indian shareholders (Singapore-based Rakesh Aggarwal, World Media Group director Sudesh Iyer, Shemaroo Entertainment Managing Director Raman Maroo, MobiApps Holding’s Jayesh Parekh, B.R. Sule, Sushil Shergil and actor Jackie Shroff ) holding 32 per cent. Capital Japan and some financial institutions own the rest 7 per cent. And of course, the third protagonist is Dasgupta, who walked a tightrope and managed to keep his job for over 14 years despite the fact that neither group of shareholders was too happy with him. Very little...

APEX VC Awards: Chiratae Ventures, Blume Ventures, Elevation Capital, Stride Ventures & Alteria Capital judged best funds of 2021

Press Release Elevation Capital , Chiratae Ventures , Blume Ventures , Stride Ventures and Alteria Capital were voted the top Venture Capital investors in India during 2021. The Venture Intelligence “Awards for Private Equity Excellence” (APEX) is dedicated to celebrating the best that the Indian Private Equity & Venture Capital industry has to offer. "VCs exist because Entrepreneurs exist and disrupt the ecosystem by creating new businesses. We are very excited to be part of the secular trend of tech disruption that would power India’s journey towards $ 10 Trillion economy over the next decade," said  T C Meenakshi Sundaram, Founder & Vice Chairman, Chiratae Ventures , winner of " VC Fund raise of the Year " award.  " We wish to thank all our entrepreneurs who have chosen to take funding from Chiratae Ventures and investors who have backed us with funds over the past 15 years in this journey.  Congratulations to the entire Chiratae Ventures team and ...